Monadelphous
4.1 out of 5 stars.
Receive weekly updates, new jobs, and reviews

Interviews at Monadelphous

Here’s what others thought about the interview process at Monadelphous.

Interview experience

Based on 156 interviews
Favourable

Interview difficulty

Based on 153 interviews
Easy

Interview process length

Based on 151 interviews
About a week

Interview process at Monadelphous

Overall experience

On a scale of 1–10 where 1 is Poor and 10 is Excellent, rating is 7.

On a scale of 1–10 where 1 is Easy and 10 is Difficult, rating is 4.

Interview process length
About a week
30%
About two weeks
28%
About a day or two
20%
More than one month
13%
About a month
9%
Most reported steps
Phone call/screening
75%
Drug test
50%
Background check
42%
On-site interview
16%
Problem solving exercises
14%
Least reported steps
Presentation
7%
They have no interview
5%
Take-home/sample work
2%

What candidates say about the interview process at Monadelphous

  • Easy, calm
    Shared on 8 May 2019 - Electrician (FIFO) - Australia
  • To know what type of knowledge you have in your trade.
    Shared on 11 September 2017
  • Interview process is very professional, the employment staff are first class.
    Shared on 16 August 2017 - Construction / facilities supervisor - Perth WA
Read more about the interview process at Monadelphous

Interview tips at Monadelphous

Dress code for the interview
  • They didn’t have a dress code35%
  • Casual (t-shirt and jeans)27%
  • Business casual (e.g. dress slacks)24%
  • Special outfit (e.g. protective gear)8%
  • Formal (business suit)6%

What advice do candidates give for interviewing at Monadelphous

  • Its best to experience it for your self and form your own opinion, having red the other feedback it would have you believe this company is good to work for, "I think not" is my experience and opinion.
    Shared on 26 May 2019 - Fitter - Cape Lambert WA
  • Be yourself
    Shared on 16 May 2019 - Trade Assistant - Perth WA
  • Companies
  • Monadelphous
  • Interviews
Tell us how to improve this page
What would you add or change?